Hauntingly Evocative

Welcome to Area X. An Edenic wilderness, an environmental disaster zone, a mystery for thirty years.

The Southern Reach, a secretive government agency, has sent eleven expeditions to investigate Area X. One has ended in mass suicide, another in a hail of gunfire, the eleventh in a fatal cancer epidemic.

Now four women embark on the twelfth expedition into the unknown…

Annihilation by Jeff VanderMeer
Southern Reach #1
Published 2014
Book Bingo: Eldritch Creatures (Hard Mode)

This is a ridiculously difficult book to review.

I picked this book up as part of the Bingo 2024 challenge for the Eldritch Creatures category. I’m a little ashamed to say, especially given that I read a lot of horror, that I didn’t realise these odd entities/creatures had a categeory of their own. Anyway, Emily, another lovely member of staff at my local Waterstones, assured me that I would love this book and that it definitely fitted what I was looking for.

Told from the point of view of “the biologist” although the tale includes others, including her own husband’s experiences, her perspective leads us beautifully through this unique, eerie tale of an exploration team (the 12th expedition according to the text) in a place called “Area X.”

The imagery in this deceptively small-looking novel is just beautiful, although not technically traditional. It lulls and lures the reader into a lyrical dance that undulates in the bizarre, and it stays with you. It’s incredibly immersive, and so odd that it’s difficult to define just how effective it is, because I can see how devisive it could be – the interpretation is completely up to the reader, and the content reflects this in the interpretation given by “the biologist” – there are no correct answers, just mystery.

There are plenty of secrets in this book and as the answers are slowly revealed, the story draws you in to its surreal and distorted and disconcerting sense of reality. You are left stranded in the in-between, a kind of limbo, yet there is a feeling of fulfillment. Still there is a sense of needing to dig deeper, to eke out the mystery, to find the reasoning. You know there is more, just not where to find it.

Atmospheric is an almost perfect descriptor, ominous is another.

Personally, I like hauntingly evocative.

“It was as if I travelled through the landscape with the sound of an expressive and intense aria playing in my ears. Everything was imbued with emotion, awash with it, and I was no longer a biologist but somehow the crest of a wave building and building but never crashing to the shore.”

4/5 stars

Avoid Sunken Ships

It Might Just Save Your Life

Years ago during a routine voyage, the SS Arcadia vanished without a trace. Sixty years later, it’s wreck has finally been discovered more than three hundred miles from its intended course… a silent graveyard deep beneath the ocean’s surface, eagerly waiting for the first sign of life.

Cove and her dive team have been granted permission to explore the Arcadia’s rusting hull, but something dak and hungry watches from below. With limited oxygen and the ship slowly closing in around them, Cove and her team will have to fight their way free of the unspeakable horror desperate to claim them.

Because once they’re trapped beneath the ocean’s waves, there’s no going back.

From Below by Darcy Coates
Published 2022
Bingo Category – Under the Surface (Hard Mode)

This review contains SPOILERS

From Below follows a group of people hired to investigate the ruins of a sunken ship that was once considered lost and has recently been re-discovered. The SS Arcadia disappeared without a trace and with no explanation as to why, rumours abounded – from mutiny to ghost stories, Cove and her diving crew aim to find the truth about the mysterious liner, but it turns out to be much more than they bargained for.

What Worked

This book is intriguing pretty much all the way through. The knocking/tapping in the walls – the deaths – the sense of fear is palpable with the original story of the ship and the diving crew in the present. This is edge of your seat stuff. It always feels like there’s an explanation – a real one – just beneath the surface; and while a perfectly reasonable and realistic explanation becomes apparent, the alternative is much more believable – the sentient beings on the ship were dormant – until Cove and her diving crew turn up.

What Didn’t Click for Me

That Roy sabotaged the ROV’s by removing the chips. 1) Surely Sean would have checked for that and 2) Why did he wait until the danger was so blatantly obvious, and seriously affecting him (Roy) before he admitted that he was the one who had done it? Roy knew that the events occurring were beyond explanation and freaking everyone out – making every extra dive more dangerous, so why didn’t he just take the hit and admit what he’d done. I mean, I know he didn’t because it moved the plot on, but it was the most stupid and reckless thing to do, and for a book where characters were mostly sensible, it just didn’t make sense for Roy to do it. Especially when the ROV’s could have got the footage that Cove was insistent that they needed to fulfil their quota.

The repetition about Cove’s previous “thrill-seeking” adventures along with her continued, escalated anxiousness with regards to diving was frustrating. Vanna being so removed from the group made some sense by the end, but even though she was a red-herring villain, she didn’t really do anything to warrant that status (aside from writing a few dodgy entries in her journal.) There was nothing that cemented her as actually dangerous, which in turn made Sean’s character arc mostly redundant until the last 10% of the book. Deveraux would have made a perfect villain, but in the end was under-utilised and ended up being a fairly average guy with a boat who was just interested in the history of the SS Arcadia.

Things I’d Like to Have Seen

Harland having a prominent position as one of the “other” entities – he was a major character in the flashbacks and was the body that was discovered in the dining room. One of the last of the original crew to succumb to the “madness,” it would have been great to have him become a sort of “hero” and save the diving crew from their fate – he tried so hard to do that while he was alive; lasted so long that the only place he had left to hide was a huge room. It was a shame he didn’t get more focus in the “present.”

Pace

Once it started to kick-off, it was honestly edge-of-your-seat stuff. the brief respites in between dives lifted a lot of the tension and it could have been ramped up even more if rather than hot chocolate and slippers, there were nightmares/noises/paranoia affecting the diving crew just as it had the original crew of the Arcadia.

Atmosphere

Tense, palpable in most of the diving scenes and especially in the flashbacks. Harland witnessing the passengers throwing themselves from the Crow’s Nest was harrowing and brutal.

The Ending

The end was much lighter than I expected it to be After the harrowing experience that the crew went through, I understood the reasoning for their decision to edit the footage and petition for the wreckage to become and official grave site etc. But the impact on the characters was lessend. perhaps it was intentional – people like to forget trauma (or the psyche does) and especially so if it’s unexplained or supernatural phenomenon. I just found it odd that everything went pretty much back to normal as quickly as it did. It was good resolution, but I’d have liked to have seen more physchological effects – if it was me, I think I’d have been messed up for a long, long while after all the shit they went through.

The Characters

They were believable. They felt “real.” I remember them all, mostly – Cove (which was a dodgy name in my opinion,) Vanna, Roy, Sean, Aidan, Hestie, Deveraux (there were a couple of extras too) and Harland and Fitz from the original timeline were particularly memorable.

Overall

I really enjoyed this. It doesn’t seem like it, from what I’ve said above, but I really, really did. It did its job and had me on tenterhooks wanting to find out what had happened and what was happening, and why. There was no clear resolution – whch worked. Was it the toxins in the fabric, or was it hibernating entities revived? That there was no explanation either way was really clever. The ending was satisfactory, but it could have been so much more. Nevertheless, it’s one I enjoyed and I’d recommmend it for anyone who likes a spooky read.

Characters: 8/10
Atmosphere: 9/10
Writing: 8/10
Plot: 7/10
Intrigue: 8/10
Logic: 6/10
Enjoyment: 8/10

7.7/10 – 3.85 stars equivalent

Bother, I’m Bothered

But Why?

Since posting this article on the communities I haunt on reddit, I’ve had a fair few people ask why I bothered writing a response to the Mythcreants article at all. I’ve also seen plenty of responses where people have considered the article similar to a troll post, and even some who initially thought that the article was satirical – and said they wouldn’t waste their time, so why would I waste mine, in fact, what makes Ms. Winkle’s opinion so valuable to me?

So I’ll make it clear here. Chris’s opinion isn’t valuable to me, not with regards to the text that she evaluated but it could be valuable to any potential readers of the Malazan series, and it could be valuable to any potential authors who specifically look towards Mythcreants for advice.

I’ve said it throughout my response and I’ll say it here again – what frustrated me about the article when I first read it, and frustrates me still (enough that I felt I should write a response) is that it is framed/presented as a teaching articleLessons From Bad Writing – yet it is not. That Ms. Winkle criticises the text, and in most cases does so in a dismissive, contemptuous, incorrect or assumptive nature is fine – she is perfectly entitled to do that in a subjective, opinion piece that is presented as such.

This is the main issue for me – as I have said before.

I love literature and everything to do with it, the good and the bad, I love that there is always something to learn. I also love teaching about literature, whenever I get the opportunity – to present arguments related to relevant text and give the ‘whys and wherefores’ and see someone piece something together in their head, and have a positive response. I also love to participate in discussions about personal opinions and feelings that have been evoked by various pieces of literature. Literature is an amazing gift and to misrepresent all of those things, to me (and this is very much my personal opinion) feels like a little bit of a tragedy.

The other issue that I have with the article is the wider misrepresentation. Not just in the case of the author or the particular piece, as I highlight above, but from a much larger perspective. Chris misrepresents, not just her article, but also what Mythcreants as a community is about. You can see the organisations principles HERE. The people who run Mythcreants (Ms. Winkle being Founder and Editor in Chief) not only write articles-a-plenty that are freely accessed on their website, but they actively charge writers for their services. These services include, but are not limited to content editing, something that is suggested in their FAQ as the best choice if a writer is asking for a critique of their work. A list of the services Mythcreants provide is HERE

I have never used the organisation for any services. I’ve skimmed a few other articles and looked at a few other topics listed, but that’s as far as I have gone, and would ever go. Nevertheless, based on just this experience, and given what I have seen (as per my response) I would not recommend or suggest Mythcreants as a professional service. To anyone.

Thank you for reading!

If you’ve got anything you’d like to say or ask, you know where to find me!

Issues, Issues

It’s All Just A Case of History Repeating

We are nearly at the end of Chris’s teaching article, and she’s evaluating the “opening overall,” as well as providing a lead in for Chapter One. I’ve numbered again, instead of bulleting.

CW: Clearly, this prologue has many issues.

1. Erikson’s information management is abysmal. He overwhelms readers with unnecessary details and bores them with dry exposition while simultaneously denying them the information they need to know

2. The characters are all flat clichés, from the naive boy who wants to be a hero, to the seasoned soldier, to the cold, imperious villain. I’m not saying you shouldn’t depict a naive child or seasoned soldier, but please do something to make them a little more interesting.

3.Most of all, Erikson’s scene design needs serious work. A series should not open with characters standing around talking about events happening somewhere else. Scenes should feature the story’s most important events. Put an important character where they need to be for that to happen.

My best guess is that despite the length of the series, it’s still overburdened with more information that it can handle. Simply telling readers about the death of Dassem, the burning Mouse Quarter, and Laseen’s plans allows Erikson to stuff in more world events than he could cover if he featured an exciting scene with Dassem’s death by angry god, Ganoes getting trapped in the Mouse Quarter during a riot, or Laseen assassinating the emperor. The only cost is everything that could have been good about this scene.

I’m not going to refer you back to everything I’ve said, but I believe my previous responses answered these issues. To be perfectly honest, I am posting this only so that anyone reading gets a complete picture of the article and how it was presented.

Chris then goes on to give the readers an opening for Chapter One, which is actually a “snippet” prior to the chapter. Given that the snippets for the prologue were considered insignificant “additions,” it’s surprising that Chris quoted this as an opening teaser. As per her previous examples, the snippet is taken out of context, and also misrepresented. So where are the lessons for budding writers? What part of this article is teaching?

Maybe, Ms. Winkle will let me know.

My final thoughts are here.

Edited to add: I posted the link to my blog response as a comment on the original article at the same time as I posted to both a reddit community and a discord community (6th August.) Comments on the post have to be approved. Mine, which explained that due to length I had provided a link, has not been approved and I have had no response from Chris thus far. Not that I expect nor need or require one. I just thought it was quite interesting.